Here are a few highlights of the UC systemwide activities and projects that are underway.
Full detailed report is available here [PDF].
Council of University Librarians (CoUL)
UCLAS 2.0. CoUL reviewed the UCLAS Assessment Survey and after much discussion began to draft a modification of the current UCLAS structure. In order to get early input, UL’s Steering Committee (ULSC) met with Coordinating Committee, and then with Coordinating Committee and Strategic Action Groups/Collection Licensing Sub-group Chairs via conference calls. In order to reach out further, the ULs Steering Committee held a joint webinar with all the CC, SAGs1-3, CLS, and LAUC Executive Board Officers. The proposal has continued to be revised and there is a communication plan to share the draft proposal and timeline more widely beyond UCLAS members in order to engage UC Libraries to implement the transition to UCLAS 2.0.
Regional Library Facilities (RLF). CoUL met with RLF Directors Erik Mitchell (UCB, NRLF) and Colleen Carlton (UCLA, SRLF) to discuss the space constraints situation. After various discussions, the RLF Collection Management Group (RLF-CM) was charged to examine the potential cost benefits (workflow; cost models) if UC were to hypothetically de-duplicate collections across the RLFs.
UCLAS 2.0. The Coordinating Committee is working closely with the UL’s Steering Committee (ULSC) on advising and supporting the transition to UCLAS 2.0.
UCLAS Webinar Series. In collaboration with the LAUC Executive Board, the UCLAS webinar series is back on track. A session with Sherri Berger, Product Manager for the UC Libraries Digital Collection (UCLDC) project was held on April 10. Upcoming sessions planned on the HathiTrust and the UC Open Access Policy. Schedule and recordings available here: http://libraries.universityofcalifornia.edu/cc/projects-groups/uclas-webinar-series
Strategic Action Group 1: Scholarly Research & Communication (SAG1)
UC OA Policy. Received in-depth updates on the process of rolling out the OA harvester at UCLA and UC Irvine. We had discussions on implications for the other campuses, and started to plan on the schedule for the remainder of 2015.
ORCID. Charged and created an ORCID project team. This team has multi-campus representation, including CDL. It is looking at possible recommendations for systemwide ORCID implementations, based on work that’s being done on UC campuses, and nationally. The group plans to make its recommendations later in the spring.
Strategic Action Group 2: Access, Discovery & Infrastructure (SAG2)
UC Shared Metadata Policy. A policy for sharing Metadata across UC is now finalized and was shared with the CoUL for final approval.
Melvyl. The Melvyl Configuration and Electronic Resources policy review Project Team was launched to review the configuration of Melvyl in particular with regards to Tier 2 and Tier 3 licensed resources.
Strategic Action Group 3: Collection Building & Management (SAG3)
Collaborative Collection Development via Digitization (CCDD) Task Force. The charge has been completed and the Collaborative Digitization Vendor Partnership Project Team was launched in March. They will be exploring a partnership with a commercial vendor to digitize a topical collection, demonstrating a collaborative UC-vendor relationship for digitization.
Shared ILS/RMS Task Force. SAG 3 thanked and concluded the SAG 3 Shared ILS/RMS Task Force, with special thanks and recognition to TF Chair Vicki Grahame (SAG 3/UCI) for her leadership and determination in this effort, and MacKenzie Smith (CoUL/UCD) for her guidance and serving as the TF’s liaison to CoUL. Learn more about next steps in the January 27 UCLAS blog post.
UC Federal Documents Archive Task Force. The UC Federal Documents Archive Implementation Oversight Team has begun their work. SAG 3 members confirmed policy/procedure and technical contacts for each campus, and confirmed acceptance of the disposition approach. Learn more about next steps in the May 18 UCLAS blog post.
Strategic Action Group 3: Collection Licensing Subgroup (CLS)
Cost Models. CLS has formed a cost shares review joint project with Joint Steering Committee (JSC) to review campus cost share models
Co-investment models. Joint Steering Committee (JSC) and CLS discussed the co-investment models draft document to be presented at the CoUL’s April 17 meeting